Zamak 3 vs. Engineering Porcelain
Zamak 3 and engineering porcelain belong to fundamentally different material chemistries. Zamak 3 is a metal, while engineering porcelain is a ceramic material. Therefore, their performance will be even more dissimilar than would be suggested by the difference in properties. There are 18 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (27, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is Zamak 3 and the bottom bar is engineering porcelain.
Mechanical Properties
| Compressive (Crushing) Strength, MPa | 410 | |
| 590 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 86 | |
| 67 to 150 |
| Fracture Toughness, MPa-m1/2 | 12 | |
| 2.0 |
| Knoop Hardness | 110 | |
| 600 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.25 | |
| 0.17 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 33 | |
| 34 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 280 | |
| 130 |
Thermal Properties
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 95 | |
| 1170 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 410 | |
| 600 to 1000 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 110 | |
| 1.8 to 6.5 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 27 | |
| 2.0 to 6.6 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.4 | |
| 2.3 to 3.0 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.5 | |
| 16 to 29 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 49 to 65 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 12 | |
| 12 to 16 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 15 | |
| 19 to 25 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 43 | |
| 0.73 to 3.9 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 8.6 | |
| 11 to 53 |