319.0 Aluminum vs. ZA-27
319.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while ZA-27 belongs to the zinc alloys. They have a modest 29% of their average alloy composition in common, which, by itself, doesn't mean much. There are 32 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 319.0 aluminum and the bottom bar is ZA-27.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 78 to 84 | |
| 100 to 120 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 72 | |
| 78 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 1.8 to 2.0 | |
| 2.0 to 4.5 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 76 to 80 | |
| 110 to 170 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.27 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 27 | |
| 31 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 170 to 210 | |
| 230 to 330 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 190 to 240 | |
| 400 to 430 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 110 to 180 | |
| 260 to 370 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 480 | |
| 130 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 170 | |
| 120 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 600 | |
| 480 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 540 | |
| 380 |
| Solidification (Pattern Maker's) Shrinkage, % | 1.3 | |
| 1.3 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 880 | |
| 530 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 110 | |
| 130 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 22 | |
| 26 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 27 | |
| 30 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 84 | |
| 53 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 10 | |
| 11 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.9 | |
| 5.0 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 7.7 | |
| 4.2 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 140 | |
| 80 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1080 | |
| 570 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 3.3 to 3.9 | |
| 8.1 to 18 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 88 to 220 | |
| 420 to 890 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 8.6 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 48 | |
| 28 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 18 to 24 | |
| 22 to 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 25 to 30 | |
| 24 to 25 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 44 | |
| 47 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 8.6 to 11 | |
| 14 to 15 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 85.8 to 91.5 | |
| 25 to 28 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0060 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 3.0 to 4.0 | |
| 2.0 to 2.5 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0060 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0.010 to 0.020 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 to 0.020 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 5.5 to 6.5 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0030 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 69.3 to 73 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |