355.0 Aluminum vs. Grade 32 Titanium
355.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while grade 32 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 355.0 aluminum and the bottom bar is grade 32 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 71 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 1.5 to 2.6 | |
| 11 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 55 to 70 | |
| 390 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 27 | |
| 40 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 150 to 240 | |
| 460 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 200 to 260 | |
| 770 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 150 to 190 | |
| 670 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 470 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 180 | |
| 310 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 620 | |
| 1610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 560 | |
| 1560 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 890 | |
| 550 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 150 to 170 | |
| 7.5 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 22 | |
| 8.2 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 38 to 43 | |
| 1.0 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 120 to 140 | |
| 2.1 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | |
| 38 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.7 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.0 | |
| 32 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 530 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1120 | |
| 180 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 2.7 to 5.9 | |
| 83 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 150 to 250 | |
| 2100 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 51 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 20 to 27 | |
| 47 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 28 to 33 | |
| 41 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 60 to 69 | |
| 3.0 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 9.1 to 12 | |
| 63 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 90.3 to 94.1 | |
| 4.5 to 5.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 1.0 to 1.5 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.6 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.4 to 0.6 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.2 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.11 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 4.5 to 5.5 | |
| 0.060 to 0.14 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.4 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 88.1 to 93 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.4 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.4 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |