359.0 Aluminum vs. Monel K-500
359.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while Monel K-500 belongs to the nickel alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 359.0 aluminum and the bottom bar is Monel K-500.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 71 | |
| 160 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 3.8 to 4.9 | |
| 25 to 36 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 100 | |
| 260 to 560 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 27 | |
| 61 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 220 to 230 | |
| 430 to 700 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 340 to 350 | |
| 640 to 1100 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 250 to 280 | |
| 310 to 880 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 530 | |
| 270 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 170 | |
| 900 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 600 | |
| 1350 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 570 | |
| 1320 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 910 | |
| 440 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 140 | |
| 18 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 21 | |
| 14 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 35 | |
| 3.1 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 120 | |
| 3.2 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | |
| 50 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.6 | |
| 8.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.0 | |
| 8.1 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 120 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1090 | |
| 280 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 12 to 15 | |
| 180 to 260 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 450 to 540 | |
| 300 to 2420 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 15 | |
| 10 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 54 | |
| 21 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 37 to 38 | |
| 21 to 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 42 to 43 | |
| 19 to 27 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 59 | |
| 4.8 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 16 to 17 | |
| 21 to 36 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 88.9 to 91 | |
| 2.3 to 3.2 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.18 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 27 to 33 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 to 2.0 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.5 to 0.7 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 1.5 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 63 to 70.4 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 8.5 to 9.5 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.010 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0.35 to 0.85 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |