6005 Aluminum vs. SAE-AISI 8630 Steel
6005 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while SAE-AISI 8630 steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 31 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (1, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 6005 aluminum and the bottom bar is SAE-AISI 8630 steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 90 to 95 | |
| 160 to 200 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 68 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 9.5 to 17 | |
| 12 to 24 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 55 to 95 | |
| 260 to 350 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 26 | |
| 73 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 120 to 210 | |
| 340 to 410 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 190 to 310 | |
| 540 to 680 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 100 to 280 | |
| 360 to 560 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
| 250 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 160 | |
| 410 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 650 | |
| 1460 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 610 | |
| 1420 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 900 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 180 to 200 | |
| 39 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 23 | |
| 11 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 54 | |
| 7.3 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 180 | |
| 8.3 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | |
| 2.6 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.7 | |
| 7.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.3 | |
| 1.5 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 20 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1180 | |
| 50 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 27 to 36 | |
| 78 to 110 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 77 to 550 | |
| 340 to 840 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 51 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 20 to 32 | |
| 19 to 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 28 to 38 | |
| 19 to 22 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 74 to 83 | |
| 10 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 8.6 to 14 | |
| 18 to 23 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 97.5 to 99 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0.28 to 0.33 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0.4 to 0.6 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 96.8 to 97.9 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.4 to 0.6 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0.7 to 0.9 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 0.15 to 0.25 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0.4 to 0.7 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.035 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.6 to 0.9 | |
| 0.15 to 0.35 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.040 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |