6065 Aluminum vs. Grade Ti-Pd8A Titanium
6065 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while grade Ti-Pd8A titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 28 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 6065 aluminum and the bottom bar is grade Ti-Pd8A titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 68 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 4.5 to 11 | |
| 13 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 96 to 110 | |
| 260 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 26 | |
| 40 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 310 to 400 | |
| 500 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 to 380 | |
| 430 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 400 | |
| 420 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 180 | |
| 320 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 640 | |
| 1660 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 590 | |
| 1610 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 890 | |
| 540 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 170 | |
| 21 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 23 | |
| 8.7 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 43 | |
| 3.5 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 140 | |
| 6.9 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.8 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.4 | |
| 49 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 840 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1200 | |
| 520 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 17 to 34 | |
| 65 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 540 to 1040 | |
| 880 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 49 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 31 to 40 | |
| 31 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 36 to 43 | |
| 31 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 67 | |
| 8.6 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 18 | |
| 39 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 94.4 to 98.2 | |
| 0 |
| Bismuth (Bi), % | 0.5 to 1.5 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0.15 to 0.4 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.7 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.8 to 1.2 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |
| Palladium (Pd), % | 0 | |
| 0.12 to 0.3 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.4 to 0.8 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 98.8 to 99.9 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |