AISI 202 Stainless Steel vs. 6070 Aluminum
AISI 202 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while 6070 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AISI 202 stainless steel and the bottom bar is 6070 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 200 | |
| 70 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 14 to 45 | |
| 5.6 to 8.6 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 290 to 330 | |
| 95 to 130 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 77 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 490 to 590 | |
| 220 to 240 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 700 to 980 | |
| 370 to 380 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 310 to 580 | |
| 350 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 290 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 910 | |
| 160 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1400 | |
| 650 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1360 | |
| 570 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 480 | |
| 900 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 15 | |
| 160 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 23 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.4 | |
| 41 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.9 | |
| 140 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 13 | |
| 9.5 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.7 | |
| 2.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 2.8 | |
| 8.3 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 40 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 150 | |
| 1170 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 120 to 260 | |
| 20 to 32 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 250 to 840 | |
| 880 to 900 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 50 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 25 to 35 | |
| 38 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 23 to 29 | |
| 42 to 43 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 4.0 | |
| 65 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 15 to 21 | |
| 16 to 17 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 94.6 to 98 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 17 to 19 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0.15 to 0.4 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 63.5 to 71.5 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.5 to 1.2 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 7.5 to 10 | |
| 0.4 to 1.0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 4.0 to 6.0 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.060 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 1.0 to 1.7 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |