AISI 305 Stainless Steel vs. 3103 Aluminum
AISI 305 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while 3103 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 31 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AISI 305 stainless steel and the bottom bar is 3103 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 170 to 220 | |
| 27 to 62 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 200 | |
| 70 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 34 to 45 | |
| 1.1 to 28 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 210 to 280 | |
| 38 to 83 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 77 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 400 to 470 | |
| 68 to 130 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 580 to 710 | |
| 100 to 220 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 230 to 350 | |
| 39 to 200 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 290 | |
| 400 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 540 | |
| 190 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1450 | |
| 660 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1400 | |
| 640 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 480 | |
| 900 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 16 | |
| 160 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 23 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.4 | |
| 42 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.7 | |
| 140 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 16 | |
| 9.5 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.8 | |
| 2.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 3.2 | |
| 8.2 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 45 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 150 | |
| 1180 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 200 to 210 | |
| 2.4 to 24 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 130 to 320 | |
| 11 to 280 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 50 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 20 to 25 | |
| 10 to 22 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 to 23 | |
| 18 to 30 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 4.2 | |
| 64 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 13 to 15 | |
| 4.6 to 9.9 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 96.3 to 99.1 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.12 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 17 to 19 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 65.1 to 72.5 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 2.0 | |
| 0.9 to 1.5 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 10.5 to 13 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.045 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.75 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |