AISI 310S Stainless Steel vs. 6005 Aluminum
AISI 310S stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while 6005 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 31 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AISI 310S stainless steel and the bottom bar is 6005 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 170 to 210 | |
| 90 to 95 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 200 | |
| 68 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 34 to 44 | |
| 9.5 to 17 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 250 to 280 | |
| 55 to 95 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.27 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 79 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 420 to 470 | |
| 120 to 210 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 600 to 710 | |
| 190 to 310 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 to 350 | |
| 100 to 280 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 310 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 1100 | |
| 160 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1450 | |
| 650 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1400 | |
| 610 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 480 | |
| 900 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 16 | |
| 180 to 200 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 16 | |
| 23 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.0 | |
| 54 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.3 | |
| 180 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 25 | |
| 9.5 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.9 | |
| 2.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.3 | |
| 8.3 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 61 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 190 | |
| 1180 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 200 to 220 | |
| 27 to 36 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 190 to 310 | |
| 77 to 550 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 51 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 21 to 25 | |
| 20 to 32 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 to 22 | |
| 28 to 38 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 4.1 | |
| 74 to 83 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 16 | |
| 8.6 to 14 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 97.5 to 99 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 24 to 26 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 48.3 to 57 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.4 to 0.6 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 2.0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 19 to 22 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.045 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 1.5 | |
| 0.6 to 0.9 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |