ASTM A369 Grade FP92 vs. ASTM A369 Grade FP2
Both ASTM A369 grade FP92 and ASTM A369 grade FP2 are iron alloys. They have 89% of their average alloy composition in common.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ASTM A369 grade FP92 and the bottom bar is ASTM A369 grade FP2.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 210 | |
| 130 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 19 | |
| 20 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 330 | |
| 160 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 76 | |
| 73 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 440 | |
| 270 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 710 | |
| 430 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 490 | |
| 240 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 260 | |
| 250 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 590 | |
| 420 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1490 | |
| 1470 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1450 | |
| 1430 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 26 | |
| 49 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
| 13 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 9.3 | |
| 7.2 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 10 | |
| 8.2 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 11 | |
| 2.6 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.9 | |
| 7.9 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 2.8 | |
| 1.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 40 | |
| 20 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 89 | |
| 50 |
Common Calculations
| PREN (Pitting Resistance) | 14 | |
| 2.5 |
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 120 | |
| 75 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 620 | |
| 150 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 25 | |
| 15 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 22 | |
| 16 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 6.9 | |
| 13 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 19 | |
| 13 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 |
| Boron (B), % | 0.0010 to 0.0060 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.070 to 0.13 | |
| 0.1 to 0.2 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 8.5 to 9.5 | |
| 0.5 to 0.81 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 85.8 to 89.1 | |
| 97.4 to 98.6 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.3 to 0.6 | |
| 0.3 to 0.61 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0.3 to 0.6 | |
| 0.44 to 0.65 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 0.040 to 0.090 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0.030 to 0.070 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 to 0.025 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0.1 to 0.3 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 to 0.025 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Tungsten (W), % | 1.5 to 2.0 | |
| 0 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0.15 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |