AWS E209 vs. AWS E320LR
Both AWS E209 and AWS E320LR are iron alloys. Both are furnished in the as-welded condition. They have 73% of their average alloy composition in common.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AWS E209 and the bottom bar is AWS E320LR.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 200 | |
| 200 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 17 | |
| 34 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.28 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 79 | |
| 77 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 770 | |
| 580 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 300 | |
| 300 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 1410 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1370 | |
| 1360 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 480 | |
| 460 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 14 | |
| 14 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 21 | |
| 36 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.8 | |
| 8.2 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.4 | |
| 6.2 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 63 | |
| 87 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 180 | |
| 220 |
Common Calculations
| PREN (Pitting Resistance) | 33 | |
| 28 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 28 | |
| 20 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 19 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 19 | |
| 15 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.060 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 20.5 to 24 | |
| 19 to 21 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.75 | |
| 3.0 to 4.0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 51.5 to 64.3 | |
| 32.7 to 42.5 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 4.0 to 7.0 | |
| 1.5 to 2.5 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 1.5 to 3.0 | |
| 2.0 to 3.0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 9.5 to 12 | |
| 32 to 36 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0.1 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.040 | |
| 0 to 0.020 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0.1 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |