AZ80A Magnesium vs. Grade 14 Titanium
AZ80A magnesium belongs to the magnesium alloys classification, while grade 14 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (1, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AZ80A magnesium and the bottom bar is grade 14 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 46 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 3.9 to 8.5 | |
| 23 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 140 to 170 | |
| 220 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 18 | |
| 41 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 160 to 190 | |
| 290 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 320 to 340 | |
| 460 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 210 to 230 | |
| 310 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 350 | |
| 420 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 130 | |
| 320 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 600 | |
| 1660 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 490 | |
| 1610 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 990 | |
| 540 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 77 | |
| 21 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 26 | |
| 8.7 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 11 | |
| 3.4 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 59 | |
| 6.9 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 12 | |
| 37 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 1.7 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 23 | |
| 32 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 160 | |
| 520 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 990 | |
| 210 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 12 to 24 | |
| 93 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 500 to 600 | |
| 450 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 15 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 69 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 51 to 55 | |
| 28 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 60 to 63 | |
| 29 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 45 | |
| 8.5 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 19 to 20 | |
| 35 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 7.8 to 9.2 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 89 to 91.9 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.12 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0.4 to 0.6 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Ruthenium (Ru), % | 0 | |
| 0.040 to 0.060 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 98.4 to 99.56 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0.2 to 0.8 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |