Annealed K94200 vs. Annealed Titanium 6-6-2
Annealed K94200 belongs to the iron alloys classification, while annealed titanium 6-6-2 belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 23 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (10, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is annealed K94200 and the bottom bar is annealed titanium 6-6-2.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 140 | |
| 120 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 32 | |
| 9.0 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.32 |
| Reduction in Area, % | 75 | |
| 23 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 54 | |
| 44 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 330 | |
| 670 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 500 | |
| 1140 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 | |
| 1040 |
Thermal Properties
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1440 | |
| 1560 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 500 | |
| 540 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 15 | |
| 5.5 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 5.0 | |
| 9.4 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.7 | |
| 1.1 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 3.0 | |
| 2.1 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.2 | |
| 4.8 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 130 | |
| 99 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 250 | |
| 4710 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.8 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 21 | |
| 34 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 17 | |
| 66 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 17 | |
| 50 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 3.7 | |
| 2.1 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 49 | |
| 75 |