EN 1.0214 Steel vs. ISO-WD43150 Magnesium
EN 1.0214 steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while ISO-WD43150 magnesium belongs to the magnesium alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is EN 1.0214 steel and the bottom bar is ISO-WD43150 magnesium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 45 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 12 to 31 | |
| 2.8 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 160 to 250 | |
| 100 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 73 | |
| 18 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 250 to 290 | |
| 140 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 330 to 460 | |
| 250 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 210 to 360 | |
| 150 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 350 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 400 | |
| 95 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1470 | |
| 610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 590 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
| 990 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 53 | |
| 140 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 12 | |
| 27 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 6.9 | |
| 31 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 7.9 | |
| 170 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 1.8 | |
| 12 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.9 | |
| 1.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.4 | |
| 24 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 18 | |
| 160 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 46 | |
| 970 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 34 to 130 | |
| 6.1 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 120 to 340 | |
| 250 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 15 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 71 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 12 to 16 | |
| 41 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 14 to 17 | |
| 52 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 14 | |
| 81 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 11 to 14 | |
| 14 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0.020 to 0.060 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.080 to 0.12 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 99.17 to 99.6 | |
| 0 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 97.5 to 98.8 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.3 to 0.5 | |
| 1.2 to 2.0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.010 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |