EN 1.6554 Steel vs. 7049 Aluminum
EN 1.6554 steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while 7049 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is EN 1.6554 steel and the bottom bar is 7049 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 230 to 280 | |
| 140 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 70 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 17 to 21 | |
| 6.2 to 7.0 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 380 to 520 | |
| 160 to 170 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 73 | |
| 27 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 780 to 930 | |
| 510 to 530 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 550 to 790 | |
| 420 to 450 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 370 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 420 | |
| 180 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1460 | |
| 640 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 480 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
| 860 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 40 | |
| 130 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
| 23 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 7.6 | |
| 36 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 8.7 | |
| 110 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 3.4 | |
| 10 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.9 | |
| 3.1 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.7 | |
| 8.1 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 22 | |
| 140 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 53 | |
| 1110 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 140 to 150 | |
| 31 to 34 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 810 to 1650 | |
| 1270 to 1440 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 45 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 27 to 33 | |
| 46 to 47 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 24 to 27 | |
| 46 to 47 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 11 | |
| 51 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 23 to 27 | |
| 22 to 23 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 85.7 to 89.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.23 to 0.28 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0.7 to 0.9 | |
| 0.1 to 0.22 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 1.2 to 1.9 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 94.6 to 97.3 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 2.0 to 2.9 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.6 to 0.9 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0.2 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 1.0 to 2.0 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.6 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 7.2 to 8.2 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |