Grade 15 Titanium vs. 6065 Aluminum
Grade 15 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while 6065 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (1, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 15 titanium and the bottom bar is 6065 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 68 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 20 | |
| 4.5 to 11 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 290 | |
| 96 to 110 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 41 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 340 | |
| 190 to 230 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 540 | |
| 310 to 400 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 430 | |
| 270 to 380 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 420 | |
| 400 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
| 180 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1660 | |
| 640 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1610 | |
| 590 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 540 | |
| 890 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 21 | |
| 170 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.7 | |
| 23 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 3.4 | |
| 43 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 6.7 | |
| 140 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 37 | |
| 11 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 4.5 | |
| 2.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 32 | |
| 8.4 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 520 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 210 | |
| 1200 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 100 | |
| 17 to 34 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 870 | |
| 540 to 1040 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
| 49 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 33 | |
| 31 to 40 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 33 | |
| 36 to 43 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 8.4 | |
| 67 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 41 | |
| 14 to 18 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 94.4 to 98.2 |
| Bismuth (Bi), % | 0 | |
| 0.5 to 1.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0.15 to 0.4 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.8 to 1.2 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0.4 to 0.6 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Ruthenium (Ru), % | 0.040 to 0.060 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
| 0.4 to 0.8 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 98.2 to 99.56 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |