Grade 32 Titanium vs. S20161 Stainless Steel
Grade 32 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while S20161 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 31 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 32 titanium and the bottom bar is S20161 stainless steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
| 46 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 390 | |
| 360 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.28 |
| Reduction in Area, % | 28 | |
| 45 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 40 | |
| 76 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 460 | |
| 690 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 770 | |
| 980 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 670 | |
| 390 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
| 330 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 310 | |
| 870 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1610 | |
| 1380 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1560 | |
| 1330 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 550 | |
| 490 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 7.5 | |
| 15 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.2 | |
| 16 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 1.0 | |
| 2.5 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.1 | |
| 2.9 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 38 | |
| 12 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 4.5 | |
| 7.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 32 | |
| 2.7 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 530 | |
| 39 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 180 | |
| 130 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 83 | |
| 360 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 2100 | |
| 390 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
| 26 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 47 | |
| 36 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 41 | |
| 29 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 3.0 | |
| 4.0 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 63 | |
| 22 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 4.5 to 5.5 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 15 to 18 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 65.6 to 73.9 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 4.0 to 6.0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0.6 to 1.2 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 4.0 to 6.0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0.080 to 0.2 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.11 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.040 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.060 to 0.14 | |
| 3.0 to 4.0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.040 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0.6 to 1.4 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 88.1 to 93 | |
| 0 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0.6 to 1.4 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0.6 to 1.4 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 |