Grade 36 Titanium vs. ASTM A572 Steel
Grade 36 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while ASTM A572 steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 25 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (6, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 36 titanium and the bottom bar is ASTM A572 steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 11 | |
| 18 to 25 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 300 | |
| 240 to 340 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.36 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 39 | |
| 73 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 320 | |
| 300 to 380 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 530 | |
| 470 to 620 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 520 | |
| 330 to 510 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
| 250 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 320 | |
| 400 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 2020 | |
| 1460 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1950 | |
| 1420 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 420 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.1 | |
| 13 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.3 | |
| 7.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 58 | |
| 1.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 920 | |
| 22 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 130 | |
| 47 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 59 | |
| 100 to 110 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 1260 | |
| 290 to 690 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 9.3 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 | |
| 17 to 22 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 17 to 21 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 45 | |
| 14 to 18 |