Grade 5 Titanium vs. C66200 Brass
Grade 5 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while C66200 brass belongs to the copper alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 5 titanium and the bottom bar is C66200 brass.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 8.6 to 11 | |
| 8.0 to 15 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 40 | |
| 42 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 600 to 710 | |
| 270 to 300 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 1000 to 1190 | |
| 450 to 520 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 910 to 1110 | |
| 410 to 480 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
| 200 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 330 | |
| 180 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1610 | |
| 1070 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1650 | |
| 1030 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 560 | |
| 390 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 6.8 | |
| 150 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 8.9 | |
| 18 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 1.0 | |
| 35 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.0 | |
| 36 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 36 | |
| 29 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 4.4 | |
| 8.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 38 | |
| 2.7 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 610 | |
| 43 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 200 | |
| 320 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 100 to 110 | |
| 40 to 66 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 3980 to 5880 | |
| 760 to 1030 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 7.2 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
| 19 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 62 to 75 | |
| 14 to 17 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 50 to 56 | |
| 15 to 16 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 2.7 | |
| 45 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 76 to 91 | |
| 16 to 18 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 5.5 to 6.8 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 86.6 to 91 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0.3 to 1.0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0.050 to 0.2 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 0.2 to 0.7 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 87.4 to 91 | |
| 0 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 3.5 to 4.5 | |
| 0 |
| Yttrium (Y), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 6.5 to 12.9 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |