Monel K-500 vs. 6262 Aluminum
Monel K-500 belongs to the nickel alloys classification, while 6262 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is Monel K-500 and the bottom bar is 6262 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 160 | |
| 68 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 25 to 36 | |
| 4.6 to 10 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 260 to 560 | |
| 90 to 110 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 61 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 430 to 700 | |
| 170 to 240 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 640 to 1100 | |
| 290 to 390 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 310 to 880 | |
| 270 to 360 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 270 | |
| 400 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 900 | |
| 160 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1350 | |
| 650 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1320 | |
| 580 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 440 | |
| 890 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 18 | |
| 170 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 14 | |
| 23 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 3.1 | |
| 44 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 3.2 | |
| 140 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 50 | |
| 10 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.7 | |
| 2.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.1 | |
| 8.3 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 120 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 280 | |
| 1190 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 180 to 260 | |
| 17 to 31 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 300 to 2420 | |
| 530 to 940 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 10 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 21 | |
| 48 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 21 to 35 | |
| 29 to 39 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 to 27 | |
| 35 to 42 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 4.8 | |
| 69 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 21 to 36 | |
| 13 to 18 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 2.3 to 3.2 | |
| 94.7 to 97.8 |
| Bismuth (Bi), % | 0 | |
| 0.4 to 0.7 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.18 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0.040 to 0.14 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 27 to 33 | |
| 0.15 to 0.4 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 2.0 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 | |
| 0.4 to 0.7 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.8 to 1.2 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 1.5 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 63 to 70.4 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0.4 to 0.8 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0.35 to 0.85 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |