Nickel 200 vs. 7049A Aluminum
Nickel 200 belongs to the nickel alloys classification, while 7049A aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is nickel 200 and the bottom bar is 7049A aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 180 | |
| 71 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 23 to 44 | |
| 5.0 to 5.7 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 120 to 350 | |
| 180 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.31 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 70 | |
| 27 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 300 to 340 | |
| 340 to 350 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 420 to 540 | |
| 580 to 590 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 120 to 370 | |
| 500 to 530 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 290 | |
| 370 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 900 | |
| 200 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1460 | |
| 640 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1440 | |
| 430 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 450 | |
| 850 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 69 | |
| 130 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
| 24 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 18 | |
| 40 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 18 | |
| 120 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 65 | |
| 10 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.9 | |
| 3.1 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 11 | |
| 8.2 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 230 | |
| 1100 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 110 to 150 | |
| 28 to 32 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 42 to 370 | |
| 1800 to 1990 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 11 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 21 | |
| 44 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 13 to 17 | |
| 52 to 53 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 14 to 17 | |
| 50 to 51 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 17 | |
| 50 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 13 to 16 | |
| 25 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 84.6 to 89.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0.050 to 0.25 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 1.2 to 1.9 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 2.1 to 3.1 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 99 to 100 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 7.2 to 8.4 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |