Nickel 200 vs. Grade 18 Titanium
Nickel 200 belongs to the nickel alloys classification, while grade 18 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is nickel 200 and the bottom bar is grade 18 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 180 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 23 to 44 | |
| 11 to 17 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 120 to 350 | |
| 330 to 480 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.31 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 70 | |
| 40 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 300 to 340 | |
| 420 to 590 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 420 to 540 | |
| 690 to 980 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 120 to 370 | |
| 540 to 810 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 290 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 900 | |
| 330 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1460 | |
| 1640 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1440 | |
| 1590 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 450 | |
| 550 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 69 | |
| 8.3 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
| 9.9 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 18 | |
| 1.3 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 18 | |
| 2.7 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.9 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 11 | |
| 41 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 670 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 230 | |
| 270 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 110 to 150 | |
| 87 to 110 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 42 to 370 | |
| 1380 to 3110 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 11 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 21 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 13 to 17 | |
| 43 to 61 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 14 to 17 | |
| 39 to 49 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 17 | |
| 3.4 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 13 to 16 | |
| 47 to 67 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 2.5 to 3.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 99 to 100 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Palladium (Pd), % | 0 | |
| 0.040 to 0.080 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 92.5 to 95.5 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 2.0 to 3.0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |