Nickel 690 vs. EN AC-48100 Aluminum
Nickel 690 belongs to the nickel alloys classification, while EN AC-48100 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (1, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is nickel 690 and the bottom bar is EN AC-48100 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 90 | |
| 100 to 140 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 200 | |
| 76 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 3.4 to 34 | |
| 1.1 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 180 to 300 | |
| 120 to 130 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 79 | |
| 29 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 640 to 990 | |
| 240 to 330 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 250 to 760 | |
| 190 to 300 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 320 | |
| 640 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 1010 | |
| 170 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1380 | |
| 580 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1340 | |
| 470 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
| 880 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 14 | |
| 130 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 14 | |
| 20 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 1.5 | |
| 27 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 1.6 | |
| 87 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 50 | |
| 11 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.3 | |
| 2.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.2 | |
| 7.3 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 120 | |
| 130 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 290 | |
| 940 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 31 to 170 | |
| 2.3 to 3.6 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 160 to 1440 | |
| 250 to 580 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 15 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 51 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 21 to 33 | |
| 24 to 33 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 to 27 | |
| 31 to 38 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 3.5 | |
| 55 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 16 to 25 | |
| 11 to 16 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 72.1 to 79.8 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 27 to 31 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 4.0 to 5.0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 7.0 to 11 | |
| 0 to 1.3 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.25 to 0.65 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 58 to 66 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 16 to 18 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 1.5 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |