Type 2 Magnetic Alloy vs. Grade 28 Titanium
Type 2 magnetic alloy belongs to the iron alloys classification, while grade 28 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 25 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (7, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is Type 2 magnetic alloy and the bottom bar is grade 28 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 38 | |
| 11 to 17 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.3 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 72 | |
| 40 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 510 to 910 | |
| 690 to 980 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 260 to 870 | |
| 540 to 810 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 270 | |
| 410 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 1640 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1370 | |
| 1590 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 460 | |
| 550 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 12 | |
| 9.9 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 3.9 | |
| 1.3 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 4.2 | |
| 2.7 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 33 | |
| 36 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.4 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 5.9 | |
| 37 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 81 | |
| 600 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 140 | |
| 370 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 18 to 160 | |
| 87 to 110 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 170 to 2010 | |
| 1370 to 3100 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 12 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 17 to 30 | |
| 43 to 61 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 17 to 25 | |
| 39 to 49 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 16 to 29 | |
| 47 to 66 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 2.5 to 3.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Cobalt (Co), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 48.2 to 53 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.8 | |
| 0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 47 to 49 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Ruthenium (Ru), % | 0 | |
| 0.080 to 0.14 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 92.4 to 95.4 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 2.0 to 3.0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |