C16200 Copper vs. 3105 Aluminum
C16200 copper belongs to the copper alloys classification, while 3105 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C16200 copper and the bottom bar is 3105 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 120 | |
| 69 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 56 | |
| 1.1 to 20 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 100 to 210 | |
| 39 to 95 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 43 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 190 to 390 | |
| 77 to 140 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 240 to 550 | |
| 120 to 240 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 48 to 470 | |
| 46 to 220 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 210 | |
| 400 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 370 | |
| 180 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1080 | |
| 660 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1030 | |
| 640 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 380 | |
| 900 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 360 | |
| 170 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 24 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 90 | |
| 44 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 90 | |
| 140 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 30 | |
| 9.5 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 9.0 | |
| 2.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 2.6 | |
| 8.2 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 41 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 310 | |
| 1180 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 10 to 99 | |
| 2.6 to 19 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 10 to 970 | |
| 15 to 340 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.2 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 18 | |
| 50 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 7.4 to 17 | |
| 12 to 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 9.6 to 17 | |
| 20 to 31 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 100 | |
| 68 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 8.7 to 20 | |
| 5.2 to 11 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 96 to 99.5 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0.7 to 1.2 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 98.6 to 99.3 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 to 0.7 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.2 to 0.8 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0.3 to 0.8 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.6 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |