C19800 Copper vs. Grade 29 Titanium
C19800 copper belongs to the copper alloys classification, while grade 29 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C19800 copper and the bottom bar is grade 29 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 9.0 to 12 | |
| 6.8 to 11 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 43 | |
| 40 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 260 to 330 | |
| 550 to 560 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 430 to 550 | |
| 930 to 940 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 420 to 550 | |
| 850 to 870 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 210 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 200 | |
| 340 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1070 | |
| 1610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1050 | |
| 1560 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 390 | |
| 560 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 260 | |
| 7.3 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 18 | |
| 9.3 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 61 | |
| 1.0 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 62 | |
| 2.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 30 | |
| 36 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.9 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 2.8 | |
| 39 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 43 | |
| 640 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 320 | |
| 410 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 49 to 52 | |
| 62 to 100 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 770 to 1320 | |
| 3420 to 3540 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.2 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 18 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 14 to 17 | |
| 58 to 59 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 14 to 17 | |
| 47 to 48 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 75 | |
| 2.9 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 15 to 20 | |
| 68 to 69 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 5.5 to 6.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 95.7 to 99.47 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0.020 to 0.5 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.1 to 1.0 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.13 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0.010 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Ruthenium (Ru), % | 0 | |
| 0.080 to 0.14 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0.1 to 1.0 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 88 to 90.9 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 3.5 to 4.5 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0.3 to 1.5 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |