C63600 Bronze vs. Grade 29 Titanium
C63600 bronze belongs to the copper alloys classification, while grade 29 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C63600 bronze and the bottom bar is grade 29 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 30 to 66 | |
| 6.8 to 11 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 42 | |
| 40 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 320 to 360 | |
| 550 to 560 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 410 to 540 | |
| 930 to 940 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 150 to 260 | |
| 850 to 870 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 230 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 210 | |
| 340 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1030 | |
| 1610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 980 | |
| 1560 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 410 | |
| 560 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 57 | |
| 7.3 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 9.3 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 12 | |
| 1.0 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 13 | |
| 2.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 30 | |
| 36 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.6 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 2.8 | |
| 39 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 45 | |
| 640 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 340 | |
| 410 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 98 to 290 | |
| 62 to 100 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 100 to 300 | |
| 3420 to 3540 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.3 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 19 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 13 to 18 | |
| 58 to 59 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 14 to 17 | |
| 47 to 48 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 16 | |
| 2.9 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 15 to 20 | |
| 68 to 69 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 3.0 to 4.0 | |
| 5.5 to 6.5 |
| Arsenic (As), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 93 to 96.3 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.13 |
| Ruthenium (Ru), % | 0 | |
| 0.080 to 0.14 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.7 to 1.3 | |
| 0 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 88 to 90.9 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 3.5 to 4.5 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |