C76200 Nickel Silver vs. Class 2 Tungsten
C76200 nickel silver belongs to the copper alloys classification, while class 2 tungsten belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals. There are 20 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (11, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C76200 nickel silver and the bottom bar is class 2 tungsten.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 120 | |
| 260 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.31 | |
| 0.28 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 44 | |
| 100 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 390 to 790 | |
| 860 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 190 | |
| 160 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 390 | |
| 120 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 45 | |
| 20 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 19 | |
| 4.6 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 9.0 | |
| 13 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 9.8 | |
| 7.8 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.2 | |
| 15 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 3.6 | |
| 23 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 57 | |
| 350 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 310 | |
| 140 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.8 | |
| 9.6 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 20 | |
| 14 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 13 to 27 | |
| 16 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 14 to 23 | |
| 13 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 14 | |
| 11 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 13 to 26 | |
| 52 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Copper (Cu), % | 57 to 61 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 11 to 13.5 | |
| 0 |
| Tungsten (W), % | 0 | |
| 92.5 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 24.2 to 32 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 7.5 |