C97800 Nickel Silver vs. Nickel 718
C97800 nickel silver belongs to the copper alloys classification, while nickel 718 belongs to the nickel alloys. They have a modest 26% of their average alloy composition in common, which, by itself, doesn't mean much. There are 28 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (6, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C97800 nickel silver and the bottom bar is nickel 718.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 130 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 10 | |
| 12 to 50 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 48 | |
| 75 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 370 | |
| 930 to 1530 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 170 | |
| 510 to 1330 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 220 | |
| 310 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 230 | |
| 980 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1180 | |
| 1340 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1140 | |
| 1260 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 390 | |
| 450 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 25 | |
| 11 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 16 | |
| 13 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 4.0 | |
| 1.4 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 4.1 | |
| 1.5 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 40 | |
| 75 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.8 | |
| 8.3 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 5.1 | |
| 13 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 76 | |
| 190 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 330 | |
| 250 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 31 | |
| 140 to 390 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 120 | |
| 660 to 4560 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.1 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 19 | |
| 23 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 12 | |
| 31 to 51 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 13 | |
| 25 to 35 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 7.3 | |
| 3.0 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 13 | |
| 27 to 44 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0.2 to 0.8 |
| Antimony (Sb), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Boron (B), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0060 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 17 to 21 |
| Cobalt (Co), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 1.0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 64 to 67 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 1.5 | |
| 11.1 to 24.6 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 1.0 to 2.5 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 2.8 to 3.3 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 24 to 27 | |
| 50 to 55 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 0 | |
| 4.8 to 5.5 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 4.0 to 5.5 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0.65 to 1.2 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 1.0 to 4.0 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 |