K93050 Alloy vs. CC140C Copper
K93050 alloy belongs to the iron alloys classification, while CC140C copper belongs to the copper alloys. There are 19 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (10, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is K93050 alloy and the bottom bar is CC140C copper.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 120 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.3 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 72 | |
| 44 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 500 to 680 | |
| 340 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 270 | |
| 210 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1430 | |
| 1100 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1380 | |
| 1040 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 460 | |
| 390 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 12 | |
| 17 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 26 | |
| 31 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.2 | |
| 8.9 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.7 | |
| 2.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 65 | |
| 41 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 120 | |
| 310 |
Common Calculations
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 7.3 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 18 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 17 to 23 | |
| 10 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 17 to 21 | |
| 12 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 16 to 21 | |
| 12 |
Alloy Composition
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0.4 to 1.2 |
| Cobalt (Co), % | 0 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 98.8 to 99.6 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 61.4 to 63.9 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 36 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 |
| Selenium (Se), % | 0.15 to 0.3 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 |