R30035 Cobalt vs. Grade 29 Titanium
R30035 cobalt belongs to the cobalt alloys classification, while grade 29 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (2, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is R30035 cobalt and the bottom bar is grade 29 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 220 to 230 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 9.0 to 46 | |
| 6.8 to 11 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 170 to 740 | |
| 460 to 510 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.32 |
| Reduction in Area, % | 40 to 74 | |
| 17 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 84 to 89 | |
| 40 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 900 to 1900 | |
| 930 to 940 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 300 to 1650 | |
| 850 to 870 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 320 | |
| 410 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1440 | |
| 1610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1320 | |
| 1560 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 440 | |
| 560 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 11 | |
| 7.3 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
| 9.3 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 1.7 | |
| 1.0 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 1.8 | |
| 2.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 100 | |
| 36 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.7 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 10 | |
| 39 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 140 | |
| 640 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 410 | |
| 410 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 160 to 320 | |
| 62 to 100 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 210 to 5920 | |
| 3420 to 3540 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 to 15 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 to 24 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 29 to 61 | |
| 58 to 59 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 24 to 39 | |
| 47 to 48 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 3.0 | |
| 2.9 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 23 to 46 | |
| 68 to 69 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 5.5 to 6.5 |
| Boron (B), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 19 to 21 | |
| 0 |
| Cobalt (Co), % | 29.1 to 39 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 9.0 to 10.5 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 33 to 37 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.13 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Ruthenium (Ru), % | 0 | |
| 0.080 to 0.14 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 88 to 90.9 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 3.5 to 4.5 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |