R60802 Alloy vs. R60901 Alloy
Both R60802 alloy and R60901 alloy are otherwise unclassified metals. They have a very high 97% of their average alloy composition in common.
For each property being compared, the top bar is R60802 alloy and the bottom bar is R60901 alloy.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 98 | |
| 98 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 22 | |
| 17 to 22 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 36 | |
| 37 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 430 | |
| 500 to 580 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 | |
| 350 to 390 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 250 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
| 270 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 22 | |
| 17 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 6.0 | |
| 6.3 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.5 | |
| 6.6 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 290 | |
| 270 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 85 | |
| 88 to 100 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 380 | |
| 640 to 760 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.3 | |
| 8.3 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 23 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 18 | |
| 21 to 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 | |
| 21 to 24 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
| 9.7 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 53 | |
| 58 to 67 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0.050 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0.070 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0.030 to 0.080 | |
| 0 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 0 | |
| 2.4 to 2.8 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 1.2 to 1.7 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 97.8 to 98.7 | |
| 96.8 to 97.5 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.11 | |
| 0 to 0.29 |