R60901 Alloy vs. R58150 Titanium
R60901 alloy belongs to the otherwise unclassified metals classification, while R58150 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 18 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (11, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is R60901 alloy and the bottom bar is R58150 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 98 | |
| 140 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 17 to 22 | |
| 13 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 37 | |
| 52 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 500 to 580 | |
| 770 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 350 to 390 | |
| 550 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 410 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
| 500 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 6.3 | |
| 8.4 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.6 | |
| 5.4 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 270 | |
| 150 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 88 to 100 | |
| 94 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 640 to 760 | |
| 1110 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.3 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 32 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 21 to 25 | |
| 40 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 21 to 24 | |
| 35 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 58 to 67 | |
| 48 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 14 to 16 |
| Niobium (Nb), % | 2.4 to 2.8 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 83.5 to 86 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 96.8 to 97.5 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.29 | |
| 0 |