ZA-27 vs. 2195 Aluminum
ZA-27 belongs to the zinc alloys classification, while 2195 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. They have a modest 29% of their average alloy composition in common, which, by itself, doesn't mean much. There are 31 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (5, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ZA-27 and the bottom bar is 2195 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 78 | |
| 69 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 4.5 | |
| 9.3 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 110 to 170 | |
| 190 |
| Fracture Toughness, MPa-m1/2 | 20 to 24 | |
| 30 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.27 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 31 | |
| 26 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 230 to 330 | |
| 350 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 400 to 430 | |
| 590 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 260 to 370 | |
| 560 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 130 | |
| 390 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 120 | |
| 210 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 480 | |
| 660 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 380 | |
| 550 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 530 | |
| 900 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 130 | |
| 130 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 26 | |
| 23 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 30 | |
| 34 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 53 | |
| 100 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 11 | |
| 31 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 5.0 | |
| 3.0 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.2 | |
| 8.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 80 | |
| 160 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 570 | |
| 1470 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 8.1 to 18 | |
| 54 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 420 to 890 | |
| 2290 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.6 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 28 | |
| 46 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 22 to 24 | |
| 55 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 24 to 25 | |
| 53 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 47 | |
| 49 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 15 | |
| 26 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 25 to 28 | |
| 91.9 to 94.9 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0 to 0.0060 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 2.0 to 2.5 | |
| 3.7 to 4.3 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 to 0.0060 | |
| 0 |
| Lithium (Li), % | 0 | |
| 0.8 to 1.2 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.010 to 0.020 | |
| 0.25 to 0.8 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 to 0.12 |
| Silver (Ag), % | 0 | |
| 0.25 to 0.6 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 to 0.0030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 69.3 to 73 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0.080 to 0.16 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |