ZA-27 vs. 355.0 Aluminum
ZA-27 belongs to the zinc alloys classification, while 355.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. They have a modest 28% of their average alloy composition in common, which, by itself, doesn't mean much. There are 32 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ZA-27 and the bottom bar is 355.0 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 100 to 120 | |
| 72 to 83 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 78 | |
| 71 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 4.5 | |
| 1.5 to 2.6 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 110 to 170 | |
| 55 to 70 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.27 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 31 | |
| 27 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 230 to 330 | |
| 150 to 240 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 400 to 430 | |
| 200 to 260 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 260 to 370 | |
| 150 to 190 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 130 | |
| 470 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 120 | |
| 180 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 480 | |
| 620 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 380 | |
| 560 |
| Solidification (Pattern Maker's) Shrinkage, % | 1.3 | |
| 1.3 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 530 | |
| 890 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 130 | |
| 150 to 170 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 26 | |
| 22 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 30 | |
| 38 to 43 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 53 | |
| 120 to 140 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 11 | |
| 9.5 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 5.0 | |
| 2.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.2 | |
| 8.0 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 80 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 570 | |
| 1120 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 8.1 to 18 | |
| 2.7 to 5.9 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 420 to 890 | |
| 150 to 250 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.6 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 28 | |
| 51 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 22 to 24 | |
| 20 to 27 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 24 to 25 | |
| 28 to 33 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 47 | |
| 60 to 69 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 15 | |
| 9.1 to 12 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 25 to 28 | |
| 90.3 to 94.1 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0 to 0.0060 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 2.0 to 2.5 | |
| 1.0 to 1.5 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 0.6 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 to 0.0060 | |
| 0 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.010 to 0.020 | |
| 0.4 to 0.6 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 4.5 to 5.5 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 to 0.0030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 69.3 to 73 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |