ZA-27 vs. 8090 Aluminum
ZA-27 belongs to the zinc alloys classification, while 8090 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. They have a modest 28% of their average alloy composition in common, which, by itself, doesn't mean much. There are 30 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (6, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ZA-27 and the bottom bar is 8090 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 78 | |
| 67 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 4.5 | |
| 3.5 to 13 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 110 to 170 | |
| 91 to 140 |
| Fracture Toughness, MPa-m1/2 | 20 to 24 | |
| 23 to 130 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.27 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 31 | |
| 25 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 400 to 430 | |
| 340 to 490 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 260 to 370 | |
| 210 to 420 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 130 | |
| 400 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 120 | |
| 190 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 480 | |
| 660 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 380 | |
| 600 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 530 | |
| 960 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 130 | |
| 95 to 160 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 26 | |
| 24 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 30 | |
| 20 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 53 | |
| 66 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 11 | |
| 18 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 5.0 | |
| 2.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 4.2 | |
| 8.6 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 80 | |
| 170 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 570 | |
| 1160 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 8.1 to 18 | |
| 16 to 41 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 420 to 890 | |
| 340 to 1330 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.6 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 28 | |
| 50 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 22 to 24 | |
| 34 to 49 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 24 to 25 | |
| 39 to 50 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 47 | |
| 36 to 60 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 14 to 15 | |
| 15 to 22 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 25 to 28 | |
| 93 to 98.4 |
| Cadmium (Cd), % | 0 to 0.0060 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 2.0 to 2.5 | |
| 1.0 to 1.6 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 to 0.0060 | |
| 0 |
| Lithium (Li), % | 0 | |
| 2.2 to 2.7 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.010 to 0.020 | |
| 0.6 to 1.3 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.020 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 to 0.0030 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 69.3 to 73 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0.040 to 0.16 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |