6005 Aluminum vs. AISI 434 Stainless Steel
6005 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while AISI 434 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 32 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (3, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 6005 aluminum and the bottom bar is AISI 434 stainless steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 90 to 95 | |
| 170 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 68 | |
| 200 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 9.5 to 17 | |
| 24 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 55 to 95 | |
| 220 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.33 | |
| 0.28 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 26 | |
| 78 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 120 to 210 | |
| 330 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 190 to 310 | |
| 520 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 100 to 280 | |
| 320 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
| 280 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 160 | |
| 880 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 650 | |
| 1510 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 610 | |
| 1430 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 900 | |
| 480 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 180 to 200 | |
| 25 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 23 | |
| 10 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 54 | |
| 2.5 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 180 | |
| 2.9 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 9.5 | |
| 9.5 |
| Calomel Potential, mV | -740 | |
| -230 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 2.7 | |
| 7.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.3 | |
| 2.4 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 150 | |
| 33 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1180 | |
| 120 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 27 to 36 | |
| 110 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 77 to 550 | |
| 260 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 14 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 51 | |
| 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 20 to 32 | |
| 19 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 28 to 38 | |
| 18 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 74 to 83 | |
| 6.7 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 8.6 to 14 | |
| 19 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 97.5 to 99 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.12 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 16 to 18 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 78.6 to 83.3 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0.4 to 0.6 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 to 1.0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 0.75 to 1.3 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.040 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.6 to 0.9 | |
| 0 to 1.0 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |