7049 Aluminum vs. ASTM A372 Grade J Steel
7049 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys classification, while ASTM A372 grade J steel belongs to the iron alloys. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is 7049 aluminum and the bottom bar is ASTM A372 grade J steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 140 | |
| 200 to 310 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 70 | |
| 190 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 6.2 to 7.0 | |
| 17 to 22 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 160 to 170 | |
| 310 to 570 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 27 | |
| 73 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 300 to 310 | |
| 410 to 630 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 510 to 530 | |
| 650 to 1020 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 420 to 450 | |
| 430 to 850 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 370 | |
| 250 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 180 | |
| 420 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 640 | |
| 1460 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 480 | |
| 1420 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 860 | |
| 470 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 130 | |
| 44 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 23 | |
| 13 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 36 | |
| 7.3 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 110 | |
| 8.4 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 10 | |
| 2.4 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 3.1 | |
| 7.8 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 8.1 | |
| 1.5 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 140 | |
| 20 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 1110 | |
| 51 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 31 to 34 | |
| 130 to 170 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 1270 to 1440 | |
| 500 to 1930 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 45 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 46 to 47 | |
| 23 to 36 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 46 to 47 | |
| 21 to 29 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 51 | |
| 12 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 22 to 23 | |
| 19 to 30 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 85.7 to 89.5 | |
| 0 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0.35 to 0.5 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0.1 to 0.22 | |
| 0.8 to 1.2 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 1.2 to 1.9 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.35 | |
| 96.7 to 97.8 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 2.0 to 2.9 | |
| 0 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0.75 to 1.1 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 0.15 to 0.25 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0.15 to 0.35 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.010 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 to 0.1 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 7.2 to 8.2 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |