AISI 410 Stainless Steel vs. Grade 32 Titanium
AISI 410 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while grade 32 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 31 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AISI 410 stainless steel and the bottom bar is grade 32 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 16 to 22 | |
| 11 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 190 to 350 | |
| 390 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.32 |
| Reduction in Area, % | 47 to 48 | |
| 28 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 76 | |
| 40 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 330 to 470 | |
| 460 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 520 to 770 | |
| 770 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 290 to 580 | |
| 670 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 270 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 710 | |
| 310 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1530 | |
| 1610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1480 | |
| 1560 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 480 | |
| 550 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 30 | |
| 7.5 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 11 | |
| 8.2 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.9 | |
| 1.0 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 3.3 | |
| 2.1 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 7.0 | |
| 38 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.7 | |
| 4.5 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.9 | |
| 32 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 27 | |
| 530 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 100 | |
| 180 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 97 to 110 | |
| 83 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 210 to 860 | |
| 2100 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 19 to 28 | |
| 47 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 to 24 | |
| 41 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 8.1 | |
| 3.0 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 18 to 26 | |
| 63 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 4.5 to 5.5 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.080 to 0.15 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 11.5 to 13.5 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 83.5 to 88.4 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.2 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.75 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.030 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.11 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.040 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0.060 to 0.14 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.4 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 88.1 to 93 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.4 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 0 | |
| 0.6 to 1.4 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |