AISI 410 Stainless Steel vs. ISO-WD21150 Magnesium
AISI 410 stainless steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while ISO-WD21150 magnesium belongs to the magnesium alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (6, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is AISI 410 stainless steel and the bottom bar is ISO-WD21150 magnesium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 45 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 16 to 22 | |
| 5.7 to 11 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.28 | |
| 0.29 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 76 | |
| 17 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 330 to 470 | |
| 150 to 170 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 520 to 770 | |
| 240 to 290 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 290 to 580 | |
| 120 to 200 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 270 | |
| 350 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 710 | |
| 110 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1530 | |
| 600 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1480 | |
| 550 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 480 | |
| 990 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 30 | |
| 100 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 11 | |
| 27 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 2.9 | |
| 19 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 3.3 | |
| 100 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 7.0 | |
| 12 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.7 | |
| 1.7 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.9 | |
| 23 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 27 | |
| 160 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 100 | |
| 980 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 97 to 110 | |
| 15 to 24 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 210 to 860 | |
| 160 to 460 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
| 15 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 25 | |
| 70 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 19 to 28 | |
| 40 to 48 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 19 to 24 | |
| 52 to 58 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 8.1 | |
| 60 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 18 to 26 | |
| 15 to 17 |
Alloy Composition
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 2.4 to 3.6 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.080 to 0.15 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 11.5 to 13.5 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 83.5 to 88.4 | |
| 0 to 0.0050 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 94 to 97 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0.15 to 0.4 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 to 0.75 | |
| 0 to 0.0050 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.040 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 to 1.0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0.5 to 1.5 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.3 |