ASTM A372 Grade J Steel vs. 359.0 Aluminum
ASTM A372 grade J steel belongs to the iron alloys classification, while 359.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is ASTM A372 grade J steel and the bottom bar is 359.0 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Brinell Hardness | 200 to 310 | |
| 90 to 100 |
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 190 | |
| 71 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 17 to 22 | |
| 3.8 to 4.9 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 310 to 570 | |
| 100 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.29 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 73 | |
| 27 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 410 to 630 | |
| 220 to 230 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 650 to 1020 | |
| 340 to 350 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 430 to 850 | |
| 250 to 280 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 250 | |
| 530 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 420 | |
| 170 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1460 | |
| 600 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1420 | |
| 570 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 470 | |
| 910 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 44 | |
| 140 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 13 | |
| 21 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 7.3 | |
| 35 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 8.4 | |
| 120 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 2.4 | |
| 9.5 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 7.8 | |
| 2.6 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 1.5 | |
| 8.0 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 20 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 51 | |
| 1090 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 130 to 170 | |
| 12 to 15 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 500 to 1930 | |
| 450 to 540 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 15 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 24 | |
| 54 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 23 to 36 | |
| 37 to 38 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 21 to 29 | |
| 42 to 43 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
| 59 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 19 to 30 | |
| 16 to 17 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 88.9 to 91 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0.35 to 0.5 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0.8 to 1.2 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 96.7 to 97.8 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0.5 to 0.7 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0.75 to 1.1 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Molybdenum (Mo), % | 0.15 to 0.25 | |
| 0 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0 to 0.015 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0.15 to 0.35 | |
| 8.5 to 9.5 |
| Sulfur (S), % | 0 to 0.010 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.1 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.15 |