Grade 21 Titanium vs. ASTM A204 Steel
Grade 21 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while ASTM A204 steel belongs to the iron alloys. There are 28 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 21 titanium and the bottom bar is ASTM A204 steel.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 140 | |
190 |
Elongation at Break, % | 9.0 to 17 | |
18 to 22 |
Fatigue Strength, MPa | 550 to 660 | |
200 to 220 |
Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
0.29 |
Shear Modulus, GPa | 51 | |
73 |
Shear Strength, MPa | 550 to 790 | |
330 to 360 |
Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 890 to 1340 | |
520 to 590 |
Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 870 to 1170 | |
290 to 330 |
Thermal Properties
Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
250 |
Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 310 | |
410 |
Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1740 | |
1470 |
Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1690 | |
1420 to 1430 |
Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 500 | |
470 |
Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 7.5 | |
52 |
Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 7.1 | |
13 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
Base Metal Price, % relative | 60 | |
2.4 |
Density, g/cm3 | 5.4 | |
7.9 |
Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 32 | |
1.5 |
Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 490 | |
20 |
Embodied Water, L/kg | 180 | |
47 |
Common Calculations
Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 110 to 180 | |
90 to 95 |
Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 2760 to 5010 | |
220 to 290 |
Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 14 | |
13 |
Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 32 | |
24 |
Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 46 to 69 | |
18 to 21 |
Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 38 to 50 | |
18 to 20 |
Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 2.8 | |
14 |
Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 66 to 100 | |
15 to 17 |