Grade 23 Titanium vs. 296.0 Aluminum
Grade 23 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys classification, while 296.0 aluminum belongs to the aluminum alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown.
For each property being compared, the top bar is grade 23 titanium and the bottom bar is 296.0 aluminum.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 110 | |
| 72 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 6.7 to 11 | |
| 3.2 to 7.1 |
| Fatigue Strength, MPa | 470 to 500 | |
| 47 to 70 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.32 | |
| 0.33 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 40 | |
| 27 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 930 to 940 | |
| 260 to 270 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 850 to 870 | |
| 120 to 180 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 410 | |
| 420 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 340 | |
| 170 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1610 | |
| 630 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1560 | |
| 540 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 560 | |
| 870 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 7.1 | |
| 130 to 150 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 9.4 | |
| 22 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 1.0 | |
| 33 to 37 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 2.0 | |
| 99 to 110 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 36 | |
| 11 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 4.4 | |
| 3.0 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 38 | |
| 7.8 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 610 | |
| 150 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 200 | |
| 1110 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 61 to 100 | |
| 7.6 to 15 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 3430 to 3560 | |
| 110 to 220 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 13 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 35 | |
| 46 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 58 to 59 | |
| 24 to 25 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 48 | |
| 30 to 31 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 2.9 | |
| 51 to 56 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 67 to 68 | |
| 12 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 5.5 to 6.5 | |
| 89 to 94 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.080 | |
| 0 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 0 | |
| 4.0 to 5.0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.013 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0 to 0.25 | |
| 0 to 1.2 |
| Magnesium (Mg), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Manganese (Mn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Nickel (Ni), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.13 | |
| 0 |
| Silicon (Si), % | 0 | |
| 2.0 to 3.0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 88.1 to 91 | |
| 0 to 0.25 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 3.5 to 4.5 | |
| 0 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.5 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.4 | |
| 0 to 0.35 |