C19200 Copper vs. Grade 5 Titanium
C19200 copper belongs to the copper alloys classification, while grade 5 titanium belongs to the titanium alloys. There are 29 material properties with values for both materials. Properties with values for just one material (4, in this case) are not shown. Please note that the two materials have significantly dissimilar densities. This means that additional care is required when interpreting the data, because some material properties are based on units of mass, while others are based on units of area or volume.
For each property being compared, the top bar is C19200 copper and the bottom bar is grade 5 titanium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 120 | |
| 110 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 2.0 to 35 | |
| 8.6 to 11 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.32 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 44 | |
| 40 |
| Shear Strength, MPa | 190 to 300 | |
| 600 to 710 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 280 to 530 | |
| 1000 to 1190 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 98 to 510 | |
| 910 to 1110 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 210 | |
| 410 |
| Maximum Temperature: Mechanical, °C | 200 | |
| 330 |
| Melting Completion (Liquidus), °C | 1080 | |
| 1610 |
| Melting Onset (Solidus), °C | 1080 | |
| 1650 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 390 | |
| 560 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 240 | |
| 6.8 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 17 | |
| 8.9 |
Electrical Properties
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Volume, % IACS | 58 to 74 | |
| 1.0 |
| Electrical Conductivity: Equal Weight (Specific), % IACS | 58 to 75 | |
| 2.0 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Base Metal Price, % relative | 30 | |
| 36 |
| Density, g/cm3 | 8.9 | |
| 4.4 |
| Embodied Carbon, kg CO2/kg material | 2.6 | |
| 38 |
| Embodied Energy, MJ/kg | 41 | |
| 610 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 310 | |
| 200 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 10 to 98 | |
| 100 to 110 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 42 to 1120 | |
| 3980 to 5880 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 7.2 | |
| 13 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 18 | |
| 35 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 8.8 to 17 | |
| 62 to 75 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 11 to 16 | |
| 50 to 56 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 69 | |
| 2.7 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 10 to 19 | |
| 76 to 91 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 452
| Aluminum (Al), % | 0 | |
| 5.5 to 6.8 |
| Carbon (C), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.080 |
| Copper (Cu), % | 98.5 to 99.19 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.015 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0.8 to 1.2 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |
| Lead (Pb), % | 0 to 0.030 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.050 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.2 |
| Phosphorus (P), % | 0.010 to 0.040 | |
| 0 |
| Titanium (Ti), % | 0 | |
| 87.4 to 91 |
| Vanadium (V), % | 0 | |
| 3.5 to 4.5 |
| Yttrium (Y), % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.0050 |
| Zinc (Zn), % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 |
| Residuals, % | 0 to 0.2 | |
| 0 to 0.4 |