R60704 Alloy vs. Reactor Grade Zirconium
Both R60704 alloy and reactor grade zirconium are otherwise unclassified metals. Both are furnished in the annealed condition. They have a very high 96% of their average alloy composition in common.
For each property being compared, the top bar is R60704 alloy and the bottom bar is reactor grade zirconium.
Metric UnitsUS Customary Units
Mechanical Properties
| Elastic (Young's, Tensile) Modulus, GPa | 97 | |
| 98 |
| Elongation at Break, % | 16 | |
| 21 |
| Poisson's Ratio | 0.34 | |
| 0.34 |
| Shear Modulus, GPa | 36 | |
| 37 |
| Tensile Strength: Ultimate (UTS), MPa | 470 | |
| 330 |
| Tensile Strength: Yield (Proof), MPa | 270 | |
| 160 |
Thermal Properties
| Latent Heat of Fusion, J/g | 240 | |
| 250 |
| Specific Heat Capacity, J/kg-K | 270 | |
| 270 |
| Thermal Conductivity, W/m-K | 22 | |
| 22 |
| Thermal Expansion, µm/m-K | 6.0 | |
| 5.9 |
Otherwise Unclassified Properties
| Density, g/cm3 | 6.7 | |
| 6.5 |
| Embodied Water, L/kg | 460 | |
| 280 |
Common Calculations
| Resilience: Ultimate (Unit Rupture Work), MJ/m3 | 64 | |
| 56 |
| Resilience: Unit (Modulus of Resilience), kJ/m3 | 370 | |
| 130 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Axial, points | 8.1 | |
| 8.4 |
| Stiffness to Weight: Bending, points | 23 | |
| 24 |
| Strength to Weight: Axial, points | 20 | |
| 14 |
| Strength to Weight: Bending, points | 20 | |
| 16 |
| Thermal Diffusivity, mm2/s | 12 | |
| 13 |
| Thermal Shock Resistance, points | 58 | |
| 41 |
Alloy Composition
Deprecated: Automatic conversion of false to array is deprecated in /home/public/compare.php on line 460
| Carbon (C), % | 0 to 0.050 | |
| 0 |
| Chromium (Cr), % | 0.2 to 0.4 | |
| 0 |
| Hafnium (Hf), % | 0 to 4.5 | |
| 0 |
| Hydrogen (H), % | 0 to 0.0050 | |
| 0 |
| Iron (Fe), % | 0.2 to 0.4 | |
| 0 |
| Nitrogen (N), % | 0 to 0.025 | |
| 0 |
| Oxygen (O), % | 0 to 0.18 | |
| 0 |
| Tin (Sn), % | 1.0 to 2.0 | |
| 0 |
| Zirconium (Zr), % | 93 to 98.8 | |
| 99.7 to 100 |
| Residuals, % | 0 | |
| 0 to 0.27 |